March 2, 2004 at 12:00 am #8648XV16Participant
Speed cameras’ proper purpose…
Comments welcome on this article… Part of my on going crusade! TNX
Please note that some of the comments and articles posted may not represent my views or the views of FORUM99 and its moderators.
HELP KEEP THIS FORUM ALIVE! Click the Make a Donation button in the top left hand corner.March 2, 2004 at 1:18 pm #18056imperialdataKeymaster
To outline what is in the link above, I have copied the text below (for those too lazy to click XV’s link!). It is in the ‘Letters to the editor’ section of The Times newspaper, March 2nd 2004:
Speed cameras’ proper purpose
From Mr Kevin Shapland
Sir, I am a former Metropolitan Police officer and now work as a consultant assisting the criminal justice system in general and the Police Service in particular to identify ways of increasing public confidence.
Everywhere I go in England and Wales I am acutely aware of how speed cameras (leading article, February 28) are undermining public confidence in the police and distracting from other areas of policing.
Speed cameras will not detect dangerous drivers or uninsured drivers or indeed those who still choose to drive whilst under the influence of drink or drugs.
It is public perception as opposed to the reality that has the greatest impact on confidence and the fact remains that the majority of people still view speed cameras as a means by the police to raise revenue.
More targeted use of speed cameras accompanied by appropriate publicity will greatly assist in increasing public confidence.
Abbotts Close, Titchmarsh,
Northamptonshire NN14 3AW.
From Councillor Richard Hughes
Sir, Speeding is a major cause of death on our roads, and is an offence. It is the job of the police to prevent and detect crime as efficiently as they can and the use of speed (or safety) cameras is as efficient as you get. The fines they raise are no more a “stealth tax” than are fines imposed for theft, fraud or any other offence.
The insistence on painting the cameras fluorescent yellow was crass. I also do not follow the argument that the cameras should be sited only where there have been at least four serious accidents.
The cameras’ purpose is to catch people breaking the law. The fact that, in doing so, loss of life may be reduced is a fortunate by-product.
5c South Street, Weedon Bec,
Northampton NN7 4QP.
March 1.March 2, 2004 at 1:29 pm #18057imperialdataKeymaster
My own view is that Mr Shapland is quite correct and fully aware of how the effect on public relations is being damaged by the ever increasing addition of unnecessary cameras. Moreover, as he clearly states, there is a distraction from other areas of policing. And remember, this is a former Metropolitan Police officer, not some unknown person with a speeding fine (no offence to anyone who fits that description!)March 3, 2004 at 2:08 pm #18058AnonymousInactive
I agree with Mr Shapland on all of his points but I think that in fairness the reply from Mr Hughes was also correct when he said “The cameras’ purpose is to catch people breaking the law. The fact that, in doing so, loss of life may be reduced is a fortunate by-product.”
Now if all cameras were sensibly sited that would be fine but often they are in areas where they can only be doing one thing – making money. Objection to painting them yellow only goes to show there is something to be covered up and hidden. Maybe speed limit signs should be removed to get more speed limit breaking offences?March 4, 2004 at 5:54 pm #18059AnonymousInactive
I think that painting cameras yellow was conceding to the fact that there is something quite wrong with the way they caught people in the first place – by hiding! Obviously people who speed past yellow cameras still do not see them hence they are still not publicised enough.March 4, 2004 at 8:13 pm #18060XV16Participant
Keep em coming folks…
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.