Home › Forums › Pure Petrolhead › Speed cameras › Home Office figures hide bad news for road safety
- This topic has 0 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 7 months ago by Radar.
- AuthorPosts
- March 30, 2006 at 9:39 pm #11843GixParticipant
Home Office figures released today show bad news for road safety and bad news for drivers.
Careless driving offences are up by 60%, but only becuase they fiddled the figures to include the offence of using a mobile phone while driving.
Figures for the offence of ‘failing to identify the driver’ (S172) are hidden away in the ‘miscellaneous’ group which is showing large increase in the number of offences. This is the hidden part of the speeding offence statistics. The rise of 30% in the miscellaneous groups probably hides a larger than 30% increase in S172 offences.
Breath tests are up, but the proportion of positive breath tests is down. It is possible that this indicates fewer drunk drivers on our roads, but it is more likely to indicate poorer targetting of breath tests by police.
The number of offences detected by speed camera is up by 6%, and the number of speeding offences detected by police is down by 29% to 191,000. This is bad news because speeding offences detected by Police have some road safety value while camera offences have a negative impact on road safety.
Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign (www.safespeed.org.uk) said: “These new statistics do not suggest that we are doing anything to improve road safety. They show that we’re hitting easy and ineffective targets, rather than taking the trouble to identify those causing a danger to others.”
“As drivers are more and more focused on legal driving they are less and less focused on safe driving. That’s why we’re 1,000 road deaths per year behind target. Our current road safety policy is directly and indirectly responsible for failing to save over 8,000 in the last decade.”
April 1, 2006 at 7:04 am #47231RadarModeratorShows just how little speed cameras have done for road safety. There has to be a push to make them put camera in places where they are really needed, such as the approach to complex junctions or the entry to built up areas.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.